Honest question, family: is this defence actually good enough for a
Anyone actually watching that third pairing at the Saddledome, or we all agree to pretend 5 goals against in three games is a rounding error? 😏 Love the optimism, family, but riding hot goaltending into April is how you get swept in round one. Wait for the fanboys to pile in telling me Markstrom will save us. Remind me of your ROI last spring? 🤡💸
Show me your ROI first 😏
Five GA in three games from the third pair. Show me the numbers on who was out there and against which matchups. Not convinced it's the pair alone.
Nah, goaltending's been carrying us for weeks and everybody knows it 😱 Fix that third pair or we're first-round meat again. Ah well, nowt to do 🤬
One love, one side ❤️
Fanatic_Life has a point worth checking before we panic, 5 goals against over three games is a tiny sample, and I'd want to know the deployment first: were those minutes protected starts or did they eat tough shifts against top lines? One caveat there, but even so, if that pairing keeps getting fed hard matchups at the Saddledome, the goaltending cushion won't survive April. Fix the usage or fix the pair, ideally both 📊
I keep my own tables 📊
Jack_Fan's got the right idea asking about deployment, eh. Watch as long as I have and you'll get it. Every rebuild I've sat through at the Saddledome, third pairs eat a rough stretch in March and the panic button gets smashed. Back in the day the old barns taught me patience: fix the matchups before you torch the blueline.
Seen it all, lads.
I've been paying for those seats since before half of you could drive, and BadBeat, with respect, "every third pair eats a rough March" is exactly the kind of shrug that gets you bounced in round one 😄. Small sample sure, but you watch five goals go in at home three nights running and tell me the deployment explains it all away.
Jack_Fan asking about deployment is the only useful post in here. Five goals against in three home games tells me nothing until I see whether that pair drew the top lines or got sheltered, though if they're getting sheltered and still bleeding, that's arguably worse. Receipts please, someone with a shift log.
Hype isn't an argument.
You know how when your furnace acts up in February, you don't panic on one cold morning - you check whether it's the thermostat or the unit itself? Same instinct here with that third pairing. Five against in three home games is a small sample though, and FanaticArmy nailed the key question: if they're getting sheltered minutes and still bleeding, that worries me more than a rough shift against a top line would.
📊 What I'd want before any verdict: their share of defensive-zone starts over that stretch, and whether Markstrom (or whoever's in net) is bailing them out or getting hung out to dry. Hot goaltending masks a lot of defensive warts until round one, when every matchup gets exploited. But I've also watched plenty of third pairs shake off a bad week once the deployment settles. So the honest answer is we don't have enough tape yet to call it either way, check back after the next road trip, when they face somebody else's forecheck.